Fair welfare maximization
نویسندگان
چکیده
We consider the general problem of finding fair constrained resource allocations. As a criterion for fairness we propose an inequality index, termed “fairness ratio,” the maximization of which produces Lorenz-undominated, Pareto-optimal allocations. The fairness ratio does not depend on the choice of any particular social welfare function, and hence it can be used for an a priori evaluation of any given feasible resource allocation. The fairness ratio for an allocation provides a bound on the discrepancy between this allocation and any other feasible allocation with respect to a large class of social welfare functions. We provide a simple representation of the fairness ratio as well as a general method that can be used to directly determine optimal fair allocations. For general convex environments, we provide a fundamental lower bound for the optimal fairness ratio and show that as the population size increases, the We would like to thank Kenneth Arrow, James Foster, Krishna Pendakur, Clemens Puppe, George Shanthikumar, participants of the 2005 Econometric Society World Congress at University College London, and seminar participants at UC Berkeley for helpful comments. Goel acknowledges NSF CAREER Award 0133968, NSF ITR Grant 0428868, a Terman Engineering Fellowship, a 3-COM Faculty Scholar Award, an Alfred P. Sloan Faculty Fellowship, and gifts from Google, Cisco, and Microsoft. Meyerson acknowledges NSF grant CCR-0122581 and ARO grant DAAG55-98-1-0170. Weber acknowledges a David T. Morgenthaler II Faculty Scholar Award and grant 1094280-1-WAKAB by the Woods Institute for the Environment. A. Goel · T. A. Weber (B) Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA e-mail: [email protected] A. Goel e-mail: [email protected] A. Meyerson Computer Science Department, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA e-mail: [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Almost-truthful Mechanisms for Fair Social Choice Functions
This paper deals with the implementation of Social Choice Functions in fair multiagent decision problems. In such problems the determination of the best alternatives often relies on the maximization of a non-utilitarian Social Welfare Function so as to account for equity. However, in such decision processes, agents may have incentive to misreport their preferences to obtain more favorable choic...
متن کاملSocial Welfare Maximization for Hybrid Market
Electricity markets throughout the world continue to be opened to competitive forces. The underlying objective of introducing competition to these markets is to make them more efficient. It is a general concept of capitalism that if fair and equitable market structures are created, which give all market participants incentives to maximize their own individual welfare, then the market as a whole...
متن کاملThe Advantages of Compromising in Coalition Formation with Incomplete
This paper presents protocols and strategies for coalition formation with incomplete information under time constraints. It focuses on strategies for coalition members to distribute revenues amongst themselves. Such strategies should preferably be stable, lead to a fair distribution, and maximize the social welfare of the agents. These properties are only partially supported by existing coaliti...
متن کاملFair Admission Control to Achieve Guaranteed Bandwidth Allocation
In this paper, we present a theoretic framework for admission controls and bandwidth allocations at network links to achieve guaranteed bandwidth allocations, which guarantee to allocate admitted flows data rates that are above their required minimum bandwidths. The admission control and bandwidth allocation are devised from the optimal solution of maximizing aggregate social welfare of the net...
متن کاملCoping with Hardness of Welfare Maximization by Introducing Useful Complexity Measures
We introduce complexity measures for set functions and apply them to the welfare maximization problem.
متن کامل